Anchor Point vs. Position

Hi Everyone,

I’ve seen a few recent tutorials that suggest using anchor point instead of position key frames to move video and stills around in AE and Premiere. Can someone explain why one using anchor point is better than position? I have the CS5.5 version, and I’m just curious about the difference/benefit.

Thanks in advance,
Donovan

 

回答1

the anchor point is relative to the layer (with 0,0 being the upper left corner of the layer), position is the relationship between a layer’s anchor point and the comp.

if the layer is the same size as the comp, the default values for each would be the same, however if you have a layer that is not the same size as the comp, then you’ll see a difference — like

if you created a new solid that was 100×100, the anchor point would be 50,50, but the position would be the center of the comp (i am assuming the comp is not 100×100).

the anchor point is also the ‘center’ of the layer for properties like rotation and scale, so if the anchor point is say 0,0 the scale and rotation properties will react diffferently that if it is in the center of the layer.

see more here:

https://help.adobe.com/en_US/aftereffects/cs/using/WS3878526689cb91655866c1103906c6dea-7dada.html

Kevin Camp
Senior Designer
KCPQ, KMYQ & KRCW

 

Thanks Kevin, that helps. I’ll check out the link you included. I think it will make more sense after I try moving things around in AE. Have a good day, Donovan

 

回答2

In general, animating position is more intuitive — you grab the layer, move it around, a keyframe关键帧 is set, etc.

For Anchor point you often drag the numbers around in the timeline, or you can use the ‘Y’ tool (I forget its name, the Y key is the shortcut) and hold down Cmd/Ctrl while dragging the anchor point and the layer will move.

The key here is that the anchor point remains in the center of the composition.

This means that rotations will happen around the center of the composition,

and scaling will happen around the center of the composition.

 

The visual result of all this is it looks more like a camera was panning摇摄, rolling原地转圈, and zooming, instead of the layer itself. So for stuff like maps and photos, where you want to make it seem like the camera’s in charge, anchor-point animation is almost always better….

 

Ben, clears it up for me. I understand now, these forums are great!

Thanks very much,
Donovan

 

原文地址:http://www.cnblogs.com/chucklu/p/16861859.html

1. 本站所有资源来源于用户上传和网络,如有侵权请邮件联系站长! 2. 分享目的仅供大家学习和交流,请务用于商业用途! 3. 如果你也有好源码或者教程,可以到用户中心发布,分享有积分奖励和额外收入! 4. 本站提供的源码、模板、插件等等其他资源,都不包含技术服务请大家谅解! 5. 如有链接无法下载、失效或广告,请联系管理员处理! 6. 本站资源售价只是赞助,收取费用仅维持本站的日常运营所需! 7. 如遇到加密压缩包,默认解压密码为"gltf",如遇到无法解压的请联系管理员! 8. 因为资源和程序源码均为可复制品,所以不支持任何理由的退款兑现,请斟酌后支付下载 声明:如果标题没有注明"已测试"或者"测试可用"等字样的资源源码均未经过站长测试.特别注意没有标注的源码不保证任何可用性